Pure JSON code #5
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Folks wanting JSON5 handling for their data can add that in their application layer. This removes the one dependency this project had, making it much more sustainable, simpler, and faster. Huzzah!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Folks wanting JSON5 handling for their data can
add that in their application layer. This removes
the one dependency this project had, making it much
more sustainable, simpler, and faster. Huzzah!
I sent a similar series of commits (which also remove
.parse()which feels unnecessary as a core method) to the upstream project (fwiw...):ijprest#12
Thanks for adding the serialization capabilities!
🎩