Linux 6.18.y non existent field rejected - #13
Open
shunghsiyu wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
commit 38498c0 upstream. Adding the u32 excl field at offset 32 of struct bpf_map right after the sha[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE] hash shifts the ops pointer from offset 32 to 40. Therefore, fix up the test case. # LDLIBS=-static PKG_CONFIG='pkg-config --static' ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_map_ptr [...] #637/1 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected:OK #637/2 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected @unpriv:OK #637/3 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: write rejected:OK #637/4 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: write rejected @unpriv:OK #637/5 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected:OK #637/6 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected @unpriv:OK #637/7 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted:OK #637/8 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted @unpriv:OK [...] Summary: 2/18 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260601150248.394863-7-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
commit 082c412 upstream. sashiko complained that 38498c0 ("selftests/bpf: Adjust verifier_map_ptr for the map's excl field") would slightly decrease the test coverage given before the test was against the verifier rejecting the ops pointer. Recover the old test with the right offsets and add the existing one as an additional test case. # LDLIBS=-static PKG_CONFIG='pkg-config --static' ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_map_ptr [ 1.672932] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #637/1 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected:OK #637/2 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read with negative offset rejected @unpriv:OK #637/3 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: write rejected:OK #637/4 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: write rejected @unpriv:OK #637/5 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected:OK #637/6 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read non-existent field rejected @unpriv:OK #637/7 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read beyond excl field rejected:OK #637/8 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read beyond excl field rejected @unpriv:OK #637/9 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted:OK #637/10 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted @unpriv:OK #637/11 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, map_ptr = map_ptr + r:OK #637/12 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, map_ptr = map_ptr + r @unpriv:OK #637/13 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, r = r + map_ptr:OK #637/14 verifier_map_ptr/bpf_map_ptr: r = 0, r = r + map_ptr @unpriv:OK #637 verifier_map_ptr:OK [...] Summary: 2/20 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260602133052.423725-4-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Bot
force-pushed
the
linux-6.18.y
branch
9 times, most recently
from
August 3, 2026 10:47
f030a63 to
f8acd0d
Compare
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Bot
force-pushed
the
linux-6.18.y
branch
7 times, most recently
from
August 11, 2026 08:17
f4cdf85 to
de658ba
Compare
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Bot
force-pushed
the
linux-6.18.y
branch
8 times, most recently
from
August 17, 2026 19:36
1c472b1 to
08d0e06
Compare
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Bot
force-pushed
the
linux-6.18.y
branch
4 times, most recently
from
August 21, 2026 07:48
29c8a7e to
39c572b
Compare
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Bot
force-pushed
the
linux-6.18.y
branch
8 times, most recently
from
August 28, 2026 19:22
de04513 to
5e16098
Compare
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2026
Our v6.18 based Android system is continuely suffering livelock and bad page stat as shown in[1] which related to broken xarray slot status. By investigating big folio operations within f2fs, we find below races and fix it by get the nr_pages before drop the refcount and folio_lock. f2fs_get_read_data_folio() calls f2fs_folio_put() before folio_nr_pages() when invalidating a large folio from the page cache. That unlocks the folio and drops the caller reference, leaving a window where a concurrent truncate or folio split can shrink the compound folio or free it before the invalidate range is computed. An undersized range then leaves split sub-folios in mapping->i_pages, which can later interact badly with truncate and reclaim (stale xarray entries and bad page state when folio->mapping no longer matches the mapping being truncated). [1] PID: 2594 TASK: ffffff8169b81580 CPU: 7 COMMAND: "Thread-3" #0 [ffffffc08ef2b8a0] xas_load at ffffffe52d1f42a4 #1 [ffffffc08ef2b900] find_get_entries at ffffffe52c185798 #2 [ffffffc08ef2bb60] truncate_inode_pages_range at ffffffe52c19e83c #3 [ffffffc08ef2bbc0] truncate_inode_pages_final at ffffffe52c19ec2c #4 [ffffffc08ef2bc20] f2fs_evict_inode at ffffffe52c4c8400 #5 [ffffffc08ef2bcc0] evict at ffffffe52c2de9f4 #6 [ffffffc08ef2bd00] iput at ffffffe52c2db1b4 #7 [ffffffc08ef2bd30] dentry_unlink_inode at ffffffe52c2d7204 #8 [ffffffc08ef2bd50] __dentry_kill at ffffffe52c2d3dcc #9 [ffffffc08ef2bd80] dput at ffffffe52c2d3c3c #10 [ffffffc08ef2bda0] __fput at ffffffe52c2b0a7c #11 [ffffffc08ef2bde0] ____fput at ffffffe52c2b1034 #12 [ffffffc08ef2bdf0] task_work_run at ffffffe52beea200 #13 [ffffffc08ef2be20] exit_to_user_mode_loop at ffffffe52bfbc17c #14 [ffffffc08ef2be80] el0_svc at ffffffe52d1f8e54 #15 [ffffffc08ef2beb0] el0t_64_sync_handler at ffffffe52d1f8d10 Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: 05e65c1 ("f2fs: support large folio for immutable non-compressed case") Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf
Bot
force-pushed
the
linux-6.18.y
branch
2 times, most recently
from
August 30, 2026 12:39
13eb4f3 to
d9f47b3
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.