Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

Update babel-register to version 6.24.1 🚀 #281

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

babel-register just published its new version 6.24.1.

State Update 🚀
Dependency babel-register
New version 6.24.1
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of babel-register.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


✨ Try the all new Greenkeeper GitHub Integration
With Integrations first-class bot support landed on GitHub and we’ve rewritten Greenkeeper to take full advantage of it. Simpler setup, fewer pull-requests, faster than ever.

Screencast

Try it today. Free for private repositories during beta.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 83.83% when pulling 8d3b34c on greenkeeper-babel-register-6.24.1 into 58d0540 on master.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants