-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor Changes to the pipeline #2
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks great, three minor suggestions:
- pandas / snakemake could be wrapped in sc-virome-scan 'base' environment (where the workflow will run from). There is env.yaml in the rootdir, though this seems to be rule specific already ?
- perhaps a --lint run (can this be combined with --dryrun) ?
- rather then flake check the name could be something related to dryrun
READMD.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
duplicate of README.md I think ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see comment on workflow, this env seems redundant with tools / kraken2.yaml ?
envs/samtools.yaml
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could this be packed with tools.yaml ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you omit --chemistry ? Auto detection should take care of this, right ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
quite some potential to optimise this, though let's tackle this later.
scripts/count_matrix_processing.py
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this need to be a rule ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This function should be anonymised (e.g. os.expanduser() )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This shouldn't be in the repo I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, I'd make a couple changes before moving on:
- clean the duplicated conda envs, not sure what is being used / what is redundant
- remove the test_download.sh
No description provided.