Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update shim to 15.8 #8406

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: 3.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update shim to 15.8 #8406

wants to merge 17 commits into from

Conversation

ddstreetmicrosoft
Copy link
Contributor

@ddstreetmicrosoft ddstreetmicrosoft commented Mar 14, 2024

Rework our 3.0 shim, as well as updating it to 15.8.

Upstream review opened: rhboot/shim-review#427

@ddstreetmicrosoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

@christopherco @adithyaj

@ddstreetmicrosoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

note that I got rid of the shim-unsigned package as it didn't make sense to me...but if we should keep it i'm open to discussion

@ddstreetmicrosoft ddstreetmicrosoft force-pushed the ddstreet/shim branch 5 times, most recently from 690fd2c to 4650129 Compare March 15, 2024 16:55
@christopherco
Copy link
Contributor

note that I got rid of the shim-unsigned package as it didn't make sense to me...but if we should keep it i'm open to discussion

Supportive of removing shim-unsigned.

Also, I noticed you are renaming shim-unsigned-aarch64 to shim-unsigned-aa64. Any concerns on keeping shim-unsigned-aarch64? The main benefit is that it aligns with familiar Fedora package naming.

@ddstreetmicrosoft ddstreetmicrosoft force-pushed the ddstreet/shim branch 3 times, most recently from 0607934 to df54566 Compare April 3, 2024 21:29
SPECS/shim/TESTING Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ddstreetmicrosoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

note that I got rid of the shim-unsigned package as it didn't make sense to me...but if we should keep it i'm open to discussion

Supportive of removing shim-unsigned.

Also, I noticed you are renaming shim-unsigned-aarch64 to shim-unsigned-aa64. Any concerns on keeping shim-unsigned-aarch64? The main benefit is that it aligns with familiar Fedora package naming.

yeah migth as well just keep the naming the same, i adjusted to remove the rename in latest push

@ddstreetmicrosoft
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebased

@ddstreetmicrosoft ddstreetmicrosoft force-pushed the ddstreet/shim branch 5 times, most recently from 810a0d8 to c67f9da Compare June 14, 2024 15:20
Release: 2%{?dist}
Name: shim-%{efiarch}
Version: 15.8
Release: 3%{?dist}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Release number should be 1?

SPECS/shim/TESTING Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
shim.azurelinux,1,Microsoft,shim,15.8,https://github.com/microsoft/azurelinux
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have to hard-code the version here (and in aarch64 file)? Can we keep the sed line and @@VERSION_RELEASE@@ to ensure these versions are kept in sync?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants