Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v2.7.1 #356

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024
Merged

Release v2.7.1 #356

merged 41 commits into from
Aug 15, 2024

Conversation

grst
Copy link
Member

@grst grst commented Aug 13, 2024

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/scrnaseq branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 13, 2024

nf-core lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 4f7a09b

+| ✅ 203 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   4 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   4 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • nextflow_config - Config manifest.version should end in dev: 2.7.1
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add in-text citation tools to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add bibliographic entries to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Only uncomment below if logic in toolCitationText/toolBibliographyText has been filled!

❔ Tests ignored:

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.14.1
  • Run at 2024-08-13 14:33:59

@grst grst requested review from fmalmeida and nictru August 13, 2024 05:53
Copy link
Member

@jfy133 jfy133 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No blockers from me!

CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -67,7 +71,8 @@ workflow SCRNASEQ {
ch_salmon_index = params.salmon_index ? file(params.salmon_index) : []

//star params
ch_star_index = params.star_index ? file(params.star_index) : []
star_index = params.star_index ? file(params.star_index, checkIfExists: true) : null
ch_star_index = star_index ? [[id: star_index.baseName], star_index] : []
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it correct to call this a ch_ prefix when it's not actually in a channel object yet (it seems)?

I'm assuming you're fine with the code, I'm just checking something hasn't been missed

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also use the ch_ prefix for value channels, or basically any variable that is used as a channel and fed into a process.
Are there "official", documented nf-core conventions somewhere?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, no standards.

Just checking that a channel generation wasn't missing anywhere, where it should have been :)

Co-authored-by: James A. Fellows Yates <jfy133@gmail.com>
@grst
Copy link
Member Author

grst commented Aug 13, 2024

image
👀

#358

@grst grst merged commit 4171377 into master Aug 15, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants