-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 194
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
wip: let's see what breaks with boot.initrd.systemd.enable #108
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I know you're not looking to merge this, but as a quick note: systemd-initrd does not quite yet have correct initrd fs/disk dependencies, because systemd does not respect I don't know that the failures are really related to that, but it does make the occasional spooky problem with initrd ordering happen and so we should wait on at least NixOS/nixpkgs#208269 before turning it on for any real tests (I'm sorry if you were already aware, since I know you're just trying to do a quick how-much-might-break test here and it's not the most relevant bit of info) |
@lilyinstarlight while I broadly agree, I will also note that I don't see anything that should cause failures like we're seeing here. So we've definitely got some bugs to squash. |
NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/208269 was merged :-) |
With minor modifications, it looks like most disko tests work with systemd-initrd, but the mdadm tests still do not because of NixOS/nixpkgs#210210. So we'll still need that fixed before we can do a test matrix or something with systemd-initrd both on and off for all tests. But we could enable it for a handful of tests now I suppose, if we really wanted to |
rebased. |
b7e126b
to
41480c4
Compare
don't merge