Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ObjectFifo] Add a pass to combine logical objFifos for connection reuse #760

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Abhishek-Varma
Copy link
Contributor

-- This commit adds a new pass
--iree-amdaie-logical-objectfifos-for-connection-reuse.
-- Essentially follows the narrative after splitting of logical objectFifos
and is aimed to address point 4 of #644 .

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Varma abhvarma@amd.com

@Abhishek-Varma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will be addressing review comments from #755 (review) along with a few known issues before marking this "ready for review".

Base automatically changed from avarma_refactor_for_combining_objFifos to main September 10, 2024 09:18
@Abhishek-Varma Abhishek-Varma force-pushed the avarma_followup_combine_objFifos branch 2 times, most recently from 524f7b6 to c14c69f Compare September 10, 2024 10:01
-- This commit adds a new pass
   `--iree-amdaie-logical-objectfifos-for-connection-reuse`.
-- Essentially follows the narrative after splitting of logical objectFifos
   and is aimed to address point 4 of #644.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Varma <abhvarma@amd.com>
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ echo "Building IREE"

$CMAKE_ARGS = @(
"-GNinja"
"-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release"
"-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the reason test_transaction isn't generated on Windows...

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I.e., once you put this back to Release Windows will pass again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants