test: add a test case for object name compatibility

[fengmk2]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Improved cleanup in object storage tests.
  • Added a test case for object name compatibility.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent update enhances the testing framework for the object storage service. It introduces a prudent measure to verify the existence of an object before its deletion in the cleanup process, ensuring a more robust testing environment. Additionally, a new test case has been added to affirm the system's ability to handle object names, regardless of whether they begin with a leading slash, enhancing the service's compatibility and flexibility.

Changes

File	Change Summary
test/OSSObject.test.ts	Added a pre-deletion check in afterEach hook; new test for slash-prefixed object names

🐇✨
In the realm of code where the data rivers flow,
A cautious rabbit hopped, its eyes aglow.
"Before you delete," it whispered with grace,
"Check if it's there, in the digital space."
And with a leap, it added with mirth,
"Let's embrace all names, for they all have worth."
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.32%. Comparing base (0cfa089) to head (20bd427).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #16   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.32%   94.32%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1867     1867           
  Branches      280      280           
=======================================
  Hits         1761     1761           
  Misses        106      106           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a4bf89b and 20bd427.

Files selected for processing (1)

• test/OSSObject.test.ts (2 hunks)

Additional comments: 2

test/OSSObject.test.ts (2)

• 488-490: The adjustment to the afterEach hook to include a check before deleting an object is a good practice to prevent potential errors during test cleanup. Please ensure that the name variable is correctly scoped and assigned within each test case to avoid unintended deletions.
• 541-573: The addition of a test case to ensure compatibility between object names with and without leading slashes is well-implemented and directly addresses the PR's objective. Please ensure that objects created during the test are properly cleaned up to prevent test pollution.