urllib@2.22.0 breaks build ⚠️

[greenkeeperio-bot]

Hello lovely humans,

urllib just published its new version 2.22.0.

State	Failing tests ⚠️
Dependency	urllib
New version	2.22.0
Type	dependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build kept failing.

It looks like your project, in its current form, is malfunctioning and this update didn’t really change that. I don’t want to leave you in the dark about updates though. I recommend you get your project passing and then check the impact of this update again.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴

---

The new version differs by 48 commits .

• 677e2ef Release 2.22.0
• 6084c35 feat: add options.nestedQuerystring (#254)
• b97d0ee feat: support cascade data with form type (#253)
• 2aceabd Release 2.21.2
• 66ae462 fix: don't listen response aborted on node > 0.10 (#252)
• bf53941 Release 2.21.1
• 6c49c9c fix: throw when write to stream timeout (#251)
• acb306d Release 2.21.0
• 269cb14 fix: should pass options to httpclient2 (#249)
• 01a9c67 test: fix Promise not defined on 0.10
• f7ec082 test: use assert instead of should
• 12c8eb9 feat: add retry delay on httpclient2
• 997d887 Release 2.20.0
• 805201e deps: bump deps versions
• bb5cfaa fix: keep the same req object across request and response event

There are 48 commits in total. See the full diff.

---

✨ Try the all new Greenkeeper GitHub Integration ✨
With Integrations first-class bot support landed on GitHub and we’ve rewritten Greenkeeper to take full advantage of it. Simpler setup, fewer pull-requests, faster than ever. Screencast Try it today. Free for private repositories during beta.

[mention-bot]

@greenkeeperio-bot, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @fengmk2 and @helloyou2012 to be potential reviewers.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #139 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #139   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.34%   89.34%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         338      338           
  Branches       88       88           
=======================================
  Hits          302      302           
  Misses         36       36

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ce34145...0a3e667. Read the comment docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #139 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #139   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.34%   89.34%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         338      338           
  Branches       88       88           
=======================================
  Hits          302      302           
  Misses         36       36

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ce34145...0a3e667. Read the comment docs.