-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: run test on Node.js 22 #507
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes encompass updating the Node.js version in the GitHub Actions workflow to include version 22, aligning with the latest developments in the Node.js ecosystem. Additionally, minor adjustments were made in test files to refine logging and debugging outputs, enhancing code clarity and maintenance. Changes
Poem
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Additional Context UsedGitHub Check Runs (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (5)
test/keep-alive-header.test.ts (5)
34-34
: Consider re-enabling or replacing the commented-out debug log.The commented-out debug log at line 34 might be useful for understanding the state of the
httpClient
after a request. If it's not necessary during normal test runs, consider enabling it conditionally based on an environment variable or a debug flag.
Line range hint
38-38
: Address the assertion failure.The assertion at line 38 fails because the expected and actual values do not match. This might indicate an issue with the test setup or the behavior of the
httpClient
. It's crucial to investigate why thepending
count is not as expected.
43-43
: Consider re-enabling or replacing the commented-out debug log.The commented-out debug log at line 43 could provide valuable insights into the state of the
httpClient
after receiving a response. Similar to the previous comment, consider enabling it conditionally to aid in debugging without cluttering normal test output.
132-132
: Consider re-enabling or replacing the commented-out debug log.The commented-out debug log at line 132 could be crucial for understanding the state of the
httpClient
before a sleep operation. This information might be critical when diagnosing issues related to state changes during the sleep period.
137-137
: Consider re-enabling or replacing the commented-out debug log.The commented-out debug log at line 137 provides insights into the state of the
httpClient
after a sleep operation. This could be particularly useful for tracking changes in the connection pool over time, which is critical for tests involving keep-alive behavior.
merge into #511 |
Summary by CodeRabbit