Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: run test on Node.js 23 #543

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

test: run test on Node.js 23 #543

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Oct 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for Node.js version 23 in the CI pipeline.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced documentation for the urllib package with new sections, examples, and detailed explanations of the request method and its options.
    • Expanded API Doc and Response Object sections for better clarity.
    • Included advanced use case examples and updated benchmarks for performance metrics across Node.js versions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request include updates to the GitHub Actions CI pipeline configuration to support an additional Node.js version (23) in the .github/workflows/nodejs.yml file. Additionally, the README.md file has been significantly enhanced with new sections, examples, and detailed explanations regarding the usage of the urllib package, particularly focusing on TypeScript, ESM, CommonJS, and advanced use cases.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/nodejs.yml Updated Node.js version parameter from '18.19.0, 18, 20, 22' to '18.19.0, 18, 20, 22, 23'.
README.md Enhanced documentation for urllib with new sections, examples, and detailed explanations of the request method and its options. Added advanced use case examples and updated benchmarks.

Poem

In the garden where code does bloom,
New Node versions chase away the gloom.
With docs so clear, and examples bright,
Developers hop with pure delight!
A rabbit's cheer for updates grand,
In the world of code, we take a stand! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

yarn add https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/urllib@543.tgz

commit: c1943e4

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef17c34 and 02a3ef5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • README.md
🧰 Additional context used

@@ -12,6 +12,6 @@ jobs:
uses: node-modules/github-actions/.github/workflows/node-test.yml@master
with:
os: 'ubuntu-latest, macos-latest, windows-latest'
version: '18.19.0, 18, 20, 22'
version: '18.19.0, 18, 20, 22, 23'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Update README to Document Node.js 23 Support

The README.md currently does not mention the supported Node.js versions. Please update the documentation to include Node.js 23 to ensure clarity for developers and users.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Consider documenting Node.js 23 support.

The addition of Node.js 23 to the test matrix is a proactive step in ensuring compatibility with the latest Node.js version. This change will help catch any potential issues early on.

Consider the following follow-up actions:

  1. Update the project's README or documentation to reflect support for Node.js 23.
  2. Verify that all project dependencies are compatible with Node.js 23.
  3. Monitor the CI runs to ensure Node.js 23 tests pass consistently, as it might be a very recent or pre-release version.

Let's check if the README mentions Node.js version support:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if README mentions Node.js version support
# Expected: README should mention supported Node.js versions

rg -i "node\.?js.*(version|support)" README.md

Length of output: 48


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Broadly search README.md for any mention of Node.js versions or compatibility
# Expected: Any line mentioning Node.js versions, compatibility, or support

rg -i "node\.?js\s*(version|versions|support|compatible|compatibility)"

Length of output: 130

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.50%. Comparing base (55a634c) to head (c1943e4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #543      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.70%   94.50%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        1208     1164      -44     
  Branches      281      281              
==========================================
- Hits         1144     1100      -44     
  Misses         60       60              
  Partials        4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant