Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[META DOC] Ingest Processors Content Gaps #4647

Closed
40 of 45 tasks
vagimeli opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 9 comments · Fixed by #4299, #5510, #5995, #5994 or #5993
Closed
40 of 45 tasks

[META DOC] Ingest Processors Content Gaps #4647

vagimeli opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 9 comments · Fixed by #4299, #5510, #5995, #5994 or #5993
Assignees
Labels
2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. Content gap

Comments

@vagimeli
Copy link
Collaborator

vagimeli commented Jul 27, 2023

What do you want to do?

  • Request a change to existing documentation
  • Add new documentation
  • Report a technical problem with the documentation
  • Other

Tell us about your request. Provide a summary of the request and all versions that are affected.
Close Ingest API content gaps as follows:

Ingest pipelines

Ingest processors

What other resources are available? Provide links to related issues, POCs, steps for testing, etc.

@vagimeli vagimeli added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. Content gap labels Jul 27, 2023
@vagimeli vagimeli self-assigned this Jul 27, 2023
@vagimeli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

vagimeli commented Aug 2, 2023

@heemin32 The doc team is working through Ingest APIs content gaps. This issue is tracking those gaps. At your availability, will you review and provide your feedback on anything we've missed? Thank you.

@vagimeli vagimeli added API and removed untriaged labels Aug 2, 2023
@heemin32
Copy link
Contributor

heemin32 commented Aug 2, 2023

  1. Enrich data (set up enrich processor, add tutorials (example geolocation, example exact values, example value to a range), enrich policy definition) is not supported in OpenSearch.

  2. foreach processor is missing.

@vagimeli vagimeli added 5 - Editorial review PR: Editorial review in progress and removed 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. labels Aug 22, 2023
@vagimeli vagimeli linked a pull request Aug 22, 2023 that will close this issue
1 task
@vagimeli vagimeli changed the title [DOC] Ingest APIs Content Gaps [META DOC] Ingest APIs Content Gaps Aug 25, 2023
@vagimeli vagimeli added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. and removed 5 - Editorial review PR: Editorial review in progress labels Aug 25, 2023
@hdhalter
Copy link
Contributor

hdhalter commented Nov 1, 2023

@vagimeli - Should we keep this open until all ingest processors are documented, or did you open a new issue for tracking?

@vagimeli vagimeli reopened this Nov 3, 2023
@vagimeli vagimeli changed the title [META DOC] Ingest APIs Content Gaps [META DOC] Ingest Processors Content Gaps Nov 3, 2023
@vagimeli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

vagimeli commented Nov 3, 2023

@heemin32 Is the enrich processor in the code? It's an XPACK feature. Doesn't appear in my list of processors when I run GET /_nodes/ingest?filter_path=nodes.*.ingest.processors. See also comments in the forum https://forum.opensearch.org/t/ingest-pipelines-support/7716/3

@heemin32
Copy link
Contributor

heemin32 commented Nov 3, 2023

@heemin32 Is the enrich processor in the code? It's an XPACK feature. Doesn't appear in my list of processors when I run GET /_nodes/ingest?filter_path=nodes.*.ingest.processors. See also comments in the forum https://forum.opensearch.org/t/ingest-pipelines-support/7716/3

OpenSearch does not have enrich processor

@vagimeli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

vagimeli commented Nov 17, 2023

@vamshin This is the primary PR for tracking the ingest processor content gaps. As I write the docs, I'll track each processor's PR in this primary PR. I'll tag you in those PRs so that you have visibility into the needed technical reviews by your team. Thanks for helping move these docs forward.

@hdhalter
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vagimeli , we will need documentation for the kv processor for a 2.12 feature. Can you please prioritize on that one next? Thanks! See #5651

@hdhalter
Copy link
Contributor

hdhalter commented Mar 6, 2024

@vagimeli - did you mean to close this? We should keep it open until all are complete.

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Jun 6, 2024

[Triage -- attendees 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment