-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update WG_NAME_sandbox_stage.md #282
Conversation
suggested updates to wg sandbox template Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we still need some re-syncing on the TAC sponsor requirements.
@@ -14,9 +14,13 @@ When contributing to OpenSSF any existing material for the new WG to work on, th | |||
|
|||
### Working Group References |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually I missed something. Per #262, I thought we had made having a TAC sponsor a requirement for WGs at the sandbox stage: https://github.com/ossf/tac/blob/main/process/TI-Gives%2BGets.md#givesrequirements
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed...this was helpful for the AIML WG.
We should consider at least a TAC "advisor" at the stage. maybe a sponsor incubating but definitely an "advisor" of sorts. |
Co-authored-by: Zach Steindler <steiza@github.com> Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zach Steindler <steiza@github.com> Signed-off-by: Sarah Evans <140007827+sevansdell@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good-to-go to me!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
5 out of 9 TAC members have approved this, merging. |
suggested updates to wg sandbox template