Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update WG_NAME_sandbox_stage.md #282

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024
Merged

Update WG_NAME_sandbox_stage.md #282

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 14, 2024

Conversation

SecurityCRob
Copy link
Contributor

suggested updates to wg sandbox template

suggested updates to wg sandbox template

Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@marcelamelara marcelamelara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we still need some re-syncing on the TAC sponsor requirements.

@@ -14,9 +14,13 @@ When contributing to OpenSSF any existing material for the new WG to work on, th

### Working Group References
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I missed something. Per #262, I thought we had made having a TAC sponsor a requirement for WGs at the sandbox stage: https://github.com/ossf/tac/blob/main/process/TI-Gives%2BGets.md#givesrequirements

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed...this was helpful for the AIML WG.

@marcelamelara marcelamelara self-requested a review March 1, 2024 18:11
@camaleon2016
Copy link
Member

We should consider at least a TAC "advisor" at the stage. maybe a sponsor incubating but definitely an "advisor" of sorts.

Co-authored-by: Zach Steindler <steiza@github.com>
Signed-off-by: CRob <69357996+SecurityCRob@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zach Steindler <steiza@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Evans <140007827+sevansdell@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@steiza steiza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good-to-go to me!

Copy link
Contributor

@mlieberman85 mlieberman85 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SecurityCRob SecurityCRob merged commit e017f74 into main Mar 14, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@SecurityCRob SecurityCRob deleted the SecurityCRob-patch-10 branch March 14, 2024 22:21
@SecurityCRob
Copy link
Contributor Author

5 out of 9 TAC members have approved this, merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants