fix blast requirement #162
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This rings a bell, I think some systems ended up with blast meaning legacy BLAST (e.g. Debiain), and others BLAST+ (e.g. conda). I don't know why the linting is complaining about no |
True. So this thing never made it to the toolshed. The question is: should it? |
|
Good point. I never ended up using it personally (we have a local mirror of the NCBI databases on our cluster, updated monthly, and our Galaxy BLAST configuration just pointed at that), and am not in a position to even try it right now (we don't have a Galaxy server currently). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We just added this repo to the planemo monitor galaxyproject/planemo-monitor#43 and I noticed that conda struggles to find a
blast+package