Remove last vestiges of old manual CACHE_BUSTER #4156
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ponylang-main
added
the
discuss during sync
|
This shouldnt be merged until after #3906 |
jemc
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2022
SeanTAllen
force-pushed
the
more-cache-buster-gone
branch
from
69870cb
to
72adae1
Compare
It was error prone so there's a slightly less error prone way that we moved to as represented here. To really make this not error prone, we'd need to move the the system as seen in: #3825
|
rebased. I believe I didn't mess anything up. @jemc can you do a quick extra set of eyes to verify? |
ponylang-main
removed
the
discuss during sync
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It was error prone so there's a slightly less error prone way
that we moved to as represented here.
To really make this not error prone, we'd need to move the the
system as seen in:
#3825