Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BREAKING: Use a single Node.js version for test & publish #1221

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

klutchell
Copy link
Collaborator

@klutchell klutchell commented Oct 17, 2024

Projects should be opinionated and define the desired node version in .node_version in the root of the project. This is supported natively via the setup-node action to and renovate to auto-detect the version to use.

Failing this, we will still fall back to testing with recent LTS releases but only select the first compatible version detected, in decending order (newest first).

Change-type: major
See: https://balena.fibery.io/Work/Improvement/Test-Node.js-projects-against-a-single-version-2262

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Website deployed to CF Pages, 👀 preview link https://831c0d96.flowzone.pages.dev

@klutchell klutchell changed the title Use a single Node.js version for test & publish BREAKING: Use a single Node.js version for test & publish Oct 17, 2024
Projects should be opinionated and define the desired
node version in .node_version in the root of the project.
This is supported natively via the setup-node action to
and renovate to auto-detect the version to use.

Failing this, we will still fall back to testing with
recent LTS releases but only select the first compatible
version detected, in decending order (newest first).

Change-type: major
Signed-off-by: Kyle Harding <kyle@balena.io>
@klutchell
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Discussed with the team and the gains by dropping some Node.js test variants would be negligible while we would lose valuable test coverage.

@klutchell klutchell closed this Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant