-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 557
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Refactor] Erase Youtube
category
#2474
Comments
Hello GabrielBittar! Please make sure to follow our Contributing Guidelines. 💪🏻 Please only work on an issue if you're assigned; otherwise, the PR will be automatically closed. |
I am up for this change |
@GabrielBittar i think its gonna be a good practice. What about the links who don't have any category? are we going create new category and subcategory? |
Yes, this seems to be the best approach, creating the new cats/subs in those cases. |
@rupali-codes |
@GabrielBittar you're assigned. |
Ok! Thanks, I'll start working on it. |
During work, found the seemingly unused |
Put them together in the same category but create different subcategory as mentioned :) |
Are you done @GabrielBittar ? |
I am for this task tho. |
No, I'm working on it. |
Oh no problem
…On Fri, 6 Sept, 2024, 11:00 pm GabrielBittar, ***@***.***> wrote:
Are you done @GabrielBittar <https://github.com/GabrielBittar> ?
No, I'm working on it.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2474 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AP333TAVZMWVNQGKWXYJQILZVHRE3AVCNFSM6AAAAABMW6PJUSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMZUGUYTMOBTHA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Thank you for contributing to LinksHub! Please take a moment to rate this repo's DX on EddieHub's RepoRater and give it a star ⭐ |
File Name
/database/youtube
Reason for Refactoring the Code
Changes proposed
Maybe we can think about dissolving
Youtube
Category, moving each of its links to the categories that fit each subject of each link that is in there.Reason
Users will most probably search content based on their interest subjects, like "design" or "frontend"... And Ytb is not a subject, it is one of the platforms from which we are taking content to insert inside those subjects.
Example
See
Languages > C Programming > CodeWithHarry
. This link seems to be in the right place, though it doesn't, at the same time. It is a ytb link, so it could be insideYoutube > WebDevelopment
as well and it would not be wrong. There are plenty of other cases that could illustrate this problem. It seems to me youtube channels should be all just likeCodeWithHarry
, in its repective section, and none inside aYoutube
category.I'm interested in working on it, if this change seems plausible.
Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: