Go back to passing an empty values() when no features are declared
#13316
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-build-execution
|
Thanks! @bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
2 tasks
Closed
3 tasks
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2024
Update cargo 10 commits in 1ae631085f01c1a72d05df1ec81f3759a8360042..7bb7b539558dc88bea44cee4168b6269bf8177b0 2024-01-17 17:26:41 +0000 to 2024-01-20 00:15:32 +0000 - feat: inherit jobserver from env for all kinds of runner (rust-lang/cargo#12776) - Fix static_mut_ref warning. (rust-lang/cargo#13329) - fix(trim-paths): remap common prefix only (rust-lang/cargo#13210) - fix(cargo-rustdoc): use same path by output format logic everywhere (rust-lang/cargo#13325) - chore: Make MSRV=N-2 the workspace default (rust-lang/cargo#13324) - Fix precise-prerelease tracking link. (rust-lang/cargo#13320) - test(pkgid): keep package ID format in sync (rust-lang/cargo#13322) - Improve GitHub Actions CI config (rust-lang/cargo#13317) - Go back to passing an empty `values()` when no features are declared (rust-lang/cargo#13316) - fix(`--package`): accept `?` if it's a valid pkgid spec (rust-lang/cargo#13315) r? ghost
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2024
Update cargo 10 commits in 1ae631085f01c1a72d05df1ec81f3759a8360042..7bb7b539558dc88bea44cee4168b6269bf8177b0 2024-01-17 17:26:41 +0000 to 2024-01-20 00:15:32 +0000 - feat: inherit jobserver from env for all kinds of runner (rust-lang/cargo#12776) - Fix static_mut_ref warning. (rust-lang/cargo#13329) - fix(trim-paths): remap common prefix only (rust-lang/cargo#13210) - fix(cargo-rustdoc): use same path by output format logic everywhere (rust-lang/cargo#13325) - chore: Make MSRV=N-2 the workspace default (rust-lang/cargo#13324) - Fix precise-prerelease tracking link. (rust-lang/cargo#13320) - test(pkgid): keep package ID format in sync (rust-lang/cargo#13322) - Improve GitHub Actions CI config (rust-lang/cargo#13317) - Go back to passing an empty `values()` when no features are declared (rust-lang/cargo#13316) - fix(`--package`): accept `?` if it's a valid pkgid spec (rust-lang/cargo#13315) r? ghost
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2024
Update cargo 10 commits in 1ae631085f01c1a72d05df1ec81f3759a8360042..7bb7b539558dc88bea44cee4168b6269bf8177b0 2024-01-17 17:26:41 +0000 to 2024-01-20 00:15:32 +0000 - feat: inherit jobserver from env for all kinds of runner (rust-lang/cargo#12776) - Fix static_mut_ref warning. (rust-lang/cargo#13329) - fix(trim-paths): remap common prefix only (rust-lang/cargo#13210) - fix(cargo-rustdoc): use same path by output format logic everywhere (rust-lang/cargo#13325) - chore: Make MSRV=N-2 the workspace default (rust-lang/cargo#13324) - Fix precise-prerelease tracking link. (rust-lang/cargo#13320) - test(pkgid): keep package ID format in sync (rust-lang/cargo#13322) - Improve GitHub Actions CI config (rust-lang/cargo#13317) - Go back to passing an empty `values()` when no features are declared (rust-lang/cargo#13316) - fix(`--package`): accept `?` if it's a valid pkgid spec (rust-lang/cargo#13315) r? ghost
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2024
Update cargo 10 commits in 1ae631085f01c1a72d05df1ec81f3759a8360042..7bb7b539558dc88bea44cee4168b6269bf8177b0 2024-01-17 17:26:41 +0000 to 2024-01-20 00:15:32 +0000 - feat: inherit jobserver from env for all kinds of runner (rust-lang/cargo#12776) - Fix static_mut_ref warning. (rust-lang/cargo#13329) - fix(trim-paths): remap common prefix only (rust-lang/cargo#13210) - fix(cargo-rustdoc): use same path by output format logic everywhere (rust-lang/cargo#13325) - chore: Make MSRV=N-2 the workspace default (rust-lang/cargo#13324) - Fix precise-prerelease tracking link. (rust-lang/cargo#13320) - test(pkgid): keep package ID format in sync (rust-lang/cargo#13322) - Improve GitHub Actions CI config (rust-lang/cargo#13317) - Go back to passing an empty `values()` when no features are declared (rust-lang/cargo#13316) - fix(`--package`): accept `?` if it's a valid pkgid spec (rust-lang/cargo#13315) r? ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is basically a revert of #13011, which made the
--check-cfginvocation becfg()when no features are declared instead ofcfg(feature, values())since it meant declaring that the configfeaturewere to be available in this form:#[cfg(feature)], which is not the case.Thankfully after some brainstorming, I proposed changing the behavior of empty
values()inrustcto no longer imply the none value and simply create an empty set of expected values. 😃For Cargo, always using
cfg(feature, values(...))means that the configfeatureis always expected, regardless of the number of features. This makes the warning better, as it will now always beunexpected config value(instead ofunexpected config name). 🎉Fixes #13011 (comment) as well as the concern in the tracking issue.
r? @epage