Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

run.py: Introduce metadata files for runs #85

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

k0machi
Copy link
Contributor

@k0machi k0machi commented Jul 22, 2024

This commit adds a new file emitted by the matrix runs, intended to
provide metadata about the run for reporting tools that are executed
later, such as Argus. Currently, the metadata file always contains the
driver name (derived from result xml name), type (in this case it's
always python), and either failure_reason key (which contains exception
stack trace that happened during .run() or path to the resulting junit
xml file relative to the metadata file.

This commit is part of ongoing task to improve matrix pipeline reporting
to Argus.

Task: scylladb/argus#289

@k0machi k0machi requested a review from fruch July 22, 2024 12:20
@k0machi k0machi self-assigned this Jul 22, 2024
@k0machi
Copy link
Contributor Author

k0machi commented Jul 22, 2024

Jenkins

scripts/requirements.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
This commit adds a new file emitted by the matrix runs, intended to
provide metadata about the run for reporting tools that are executed
later, such as Argus. Currently, the metadata file always contains the
driver name (derived from result xml name), type (in this case it's
always python), and either failure_reason key (which contains exception
stack trace that happened during .run() or path to the resulting junit
xml file relative to the metadata file.

This commit is part of ongoing task to improve matrix pipeline reporting
to Argus.

Task: scylladb/argus#289
@fruch
Copy link
Contributor

fruch commented Jul 25, 2024

@k0machi we have a confirmation this is working as expected ?

@k0machi
Copy link
Contributor Author

k0machi commented Jul 25, 2024

@k0machi we have a confirmation this is working as expected ?

Seems like it, I will need to modify the pipeline now to verify it completely.

Copy link
Contributor

@fruch fruch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@fruch fruch merged commit dcbe423 into scylladb:master Aug 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants