-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(closes #2629) Fix NEMOv5 issues #2698
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2698 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.86% 99.86%
=======================================
Files 353 353
Lines 48996 49024 +28
=======================================
+ Hits 48932 48960 +28
Misses 64 64 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ed5f21b
to
9ca86b8
Compare
9ca86b8
to
1647dc7
Compare
ecb6625
to
3813045
Compare
73b0a76
to
3f6dd77
Compare
@arporter This is ready for review, it compiles NEMOv5 and LFRic with the new spack repository, where there is software stack to build the applications with gfortran-14 nvhpc-24.5 and intel-24.2. I addition:
I have not yet deleted the current NEMOv5 version that there is in the nemo_test workflow, because the output is very slightly different: If the reviewer I ok with this numbers I could update the KGO file, do the nemov5 check for this compiler with exact output match and deleted from the nemov4 workflow. |
@arporter This is ready for next review |
I just realised that I made a typo in the branch name and some commits by referring to 2692, but this PR solves issue 2629, sorry for the confusion |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good now. I think we 'just' need to get to the bottom of the configuration to use for these tests. As you say, we could include other keys to maximise our exposure but, if that causes problems, we can delay that step.
@arporter Ready for another review, I just slightly updated the test filenames and removed del_keys on the workflow. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All good now.
Integration tests were all green.
Will proceed to merge.
No description provided.