Fix X2 raster orientation and compression - #28
Open
clanky1024 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
clanky1024
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 17, 2026 10:38
|
@tomLadder could this please be reviewed? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to #17.
Summary
windowBits: 10level: -1memLevel: 8strategy: 0fflatecompression behaviorRoot cause
The X2 print stream differed from the working LabelForge implementation in two raster-level details:
78 9C) instead of the vendor’s 1 KiB window (28 91).The printer accepted the command stream and returned
OK, but did not print the incompatible raster correctly.Compatibility
The new behavior is selected only for devices advertising the X2 name prefix. M60 and other printer profiles retain their existing raster rotation and compression settings.
Validation
28 91zlib header and X2/M60 profile isolation.Attribution
The protocol analysis compared Thermoprint’s X2 implementation with the working implementation in the LabelForge project. The analysis and implementation were completed with assistance from the OpenAI Codex model.