Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update upstream v1.1.0 #4

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024
Merged

Update upstream v1.1.0 #4

merged 25 commits into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

Anufant
Copy link

@Anufant Anufant commented Feb 4, 2024

No description provided.

pavelnikolov and others added 25 commits April 13, 2021 12:00
- add tests for graphql.Time as reference implementation
expose packer.Unmarshaler as decode.Unmarshaler to the public
Part of graph-gophers#434 and related to graph-gophers#116 this change adds a new package containing all
types used by graphql-go in representing the GraphQL specification. The names
used in this package should match the specification as closely as possible.

In order to have cohesion, all internal packages that use GraphQL types have
been changed to use this new package.

This change is large but mostly mechanical. I recommend starting by reading
through the `types` package to build familiarity. I'll call out places in the
code where I made decisions and what the tradeoffs were.
This additive function shouldn't break backward compatibility will allow those
who want access to the types to get at an AST version of the `types.Schema`
This was an error. When this field was renamed from schema.Field (to avoid
ambiguity) its name field changed to match query.Field (to Ident). This caused a
cascade of useless changes that will be rolled back in the next commit
Add location fields to type definitions
errors.Errorf preserves original error similar to fmt.Error
@blessedvictim blessedvictim merged commit fd2970f into master Feb 5, 2024
1 check passed
@Anufant Anufant deleted the update-upstream-v1.1.0 branch February 13, 2024 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants