-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[develop] Add smoke and dust capability #1127
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Tested smoke/dust on Hera:
Fundamental SRW tests:
Approving. |
@RatkoVasic-NOAA, thank you so much for your test and approval !!! :) |
After rewinding/booting the first
The fundamental tests successfully passed on Hera:
Currently running the AQM WE2E test on Hera and will report once it completes. Please be aware, there are several coding standard issues with the changes in this PR. In hopes of kicking off some discussion (if need be, a larger discussion will take place during the Thursday code management meeting), I have the following concerns:
In PR #1089, we should be able to remove the dependency of the Do you know which commits are still required in
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SRW coding standard issues need to be discussed before moving forward with final testing and merging this work to develop. Hopefully, discussion and take place in this PR. Otherwise, discussion will begin during Thursday's code management meeting.
@MichaelLueken, thanks for your review:
|
If the smoke and dust capability is only available in the RRFS v1 production branch, and not in the develop branch in the ufs-weather-model, then we can't move forward with integrating this into the SRW develop branch at this time. The RRFS v1 and RRFS-SD implementation schedule has been suspended due to issues with severe convection encountered during the Hazardous Weather Testbed's 2024 Spring Experiment. If capabilities are available in develop branches for all component repositories, then we can move forward with introducing this work into the SRW develop branch. Since the ICs/LBCs for the new smoke dust WE2E test are RAP and not RRFS, I suspect that the current UFS_UTILS hash should be sufficient (if it used RRFS, then we would need to wait until Natalie's PR #1089). I'll also check the current UPP hash. While the release branch has several changes, I can't tell if those changes are for RRFS-SD or RRFS v1. Thanks for explaining the purpose behind the new ex-scripts and j-jobs. I certainly agree with you that changing all of the ex-scripts and j-jobs to follow NCO standards lies outside the scope of this PR. |
… into smoke_dust
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:
Steps to build and run for smoke/dust:
Externals_smokes_dust.cfg
:--smoke
:Type of change
TESTS CONDUCTED:
DOCUMENTATION:
Documentation will be followed by a separate PR.
ISSUE:
Fixes issue mentioned #1126
CHECKLIST