Clarify RowFn infallibility documentation - #9618
1 benchmark regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 2092 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 106 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | WallTime | mul_u32_nonnull_avx512 |
5.6 µs | 6.3 µs | -10.97% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_avx512[16384] |
21.2 µs | 17.6 µs | +20.3% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_avx2[16384] |
21.3 µs | 17.7 µs | +20.06% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar_avx2[65536] |
9.4 µs | 8.2 µs | +14.34% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | mul_i32_nonnull_avx512 |
8 µs | 7.2 µs | +10.26% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/decode-fail-docs (7436e2c) with develop (d2c1d29)
Footnotes
-
106 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩