Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: class_attributes_separation ruleset #280

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024
Merged

fix: class_attributes_separation ruleset #280

merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

lotyp
Copy link
Member

@lotyp lotyp commented May 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated rule set to use only_if_meta instead of one.
    • Simplified rules by removing several unnecessary elements.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The ExtendedPERSet.php file has undergone modifications where the case property in the rules array was updated from 'one' to 'only_if_meta'. Additionally, several elements related to properties and methods, including static and abstract types, have been removed from the array, simplifying the set of rules.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/RuleSets/ExtendedPERSet.php Updated case property from 'one' to 'only_if_meta' and removed several elements from the array.

🐇
In code's vast and endless night,
We changed the rules to set things right.
With properties and methods trimmed away,
Our code is simpler, come what may.
So hop along, dear coder friend,
To cleaner scripts, without an end.
🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.37%. Comparing base (662acfe) to head (d72c48a).

Files Patch % Lines
src/RuleSets/ExtendedPERSet.php 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #280   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     56.37%   56.37%           
  Complexity       19       19           
=========================================
  Files             3        3           
  Lines           243      243           
=========================================
  Hits            137      137           
  Misses          106      106           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lotyp lotyp merged commit cb5ff21 into master May 23, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@lotyp lotyp deleted the docs/updates branch May 23, 2024 14:52
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 662acfe and d72c48a.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/RuleSets/ExtendedPERSet.php (2 hunks)
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
codecov/patch failure (1)

src/RuleSets/ExtendedPERSet.php: [warning] 81-81: src/RuleSets/ExtendedPERSet.php#L81
Added line #L81 was not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (1)
src/RuleSets/ExtendedPERSet.php (1)

81-81: Update to 'case' property in 'class_attributes_separation' to 'only_if_meta' aligns with the intended stricter separation rules.

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
'method' => 'one',
'property' => 'one',
'trait_import' => 'none',
'case' => 'one',
'case' => 'only_if_meta',
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

The added line 'case' => 'only_if_meta' in src/RuleSets/ExtendedPERSet.php is not covered by tests. No references to this rule were found in the test files.

  • src/RuleSets/ExtendedPERSet.php
  • src/RuleSets/DefaultSet.php
Analysis chain

The added line #L81 was not covered by tests.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the new rule 'case' => 'only_if_meta' is covered by tests.

# Test: Search for tests covering the 'case' rule in 'class_attributes_separation'.
rg --type php $'class_attributes_separation.*case.*only_if_meta' tests/

Length of output: 72



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Broaden the search to find any references to 'class_attributes_separation' in the tests.

# Step 1: Search for any references to 'class_attributes_separation' in the tests.
rg --type php 'class_attributes_separation' tests/

# Step 2: If found, search within those files for 'case' => 'only_if_meta'.
for file in $(rg --files-with-matches --type php 'class_attributes_separation' tests/); do
    rg --type php 'case.*only_if_meta' "$file"
done

Length of output: 123



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition and usage of 'class_attributes_separation' and search for any related tests.

# Step 1: Search for the definition of 'class_attributes_separation' in the codebase.
rg --type php 'class_attributes_separation' src/

# Step 2: Search for any related tests that might indirectly cover the new rule.
rg --type php 'only_if_meta' tests/

Length of output: 238

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants