-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
disable storage account shared key access for miwi and use sas policy for cluster storage account #3894
Open
rajdeepc2792
wants to merge
3
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
rajdeepc2792/ARO-9712-disable-storage-account-shared-key-access-for-miwi
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+70
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rajdeepc2792
requested review from
jewzaam,
bennerv,
hawkowl,
rogbas,
petrkotas,
jharrington22,
cblecker,
cadenmarchese,
UlrichSchlueter,
SudoBrendan,
yjst2012,
jaitaiwan,
anshulvermapatel,
hlipsig,
tiguelu,
SrinivasAtmakuri,
mociarain,
kimorris27,
tsatam,
bitoku and
fahlmant
as code owners
October 9, 2024 18:28
rajdeepc2792
commented
Oct 9, 2024
/azp run ci,e2e |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
rajdeepc2792
added
ready-for-review
chainsaw
Pull requests or issues owned by Team Chainsaw
hold
Hold
and removed
work-in-progress
labels
Oct 10, 2024
Putting a hold as #3878 and openshift/installer-aro-wrapper#175 should get merge first. |
Please rebase pull request. |
rajdeepc2792
force-pushed
the
rajdeepc2792/ARO-9712-disable-storage-account-shared-key-access-for-miwi
branch
from
October 18, 2024 16:41
2c81bda
to
3eb641a
Compare
/azp run ci,e2e |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
rajdeepc2792
force-pushed
the
rajdeepc2792/ARO-9712-disable-storage-account-shared-key-access-for-miwi
branch
from
October 18, 2024 19:55
3eb641a
to
6a7b56d
Compare
/azp run ci,e2e |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s). |
Please rebase pull request. |
rajdeepc2792
force-pushed
the
rajdeepc2792/ARO-9712-disable-storage-account-shared-key-access-for-miwi
branch
from
October 22, 2024 20:41
e9e1b6b
to
275afd9
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue this PR addresses:
Fixes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ARO-9712 in combination with installer-wrapper PR:- openshift/installer-aro-wrapper#186
What this PR does / why we need it:
For MIWI:
For MIWI + Cluster Storage Account:
Test plan for issue:
[x] CI
[x] e2e
[x] Test the flow of cluster install such that the Shared Access Keys are disabled.
[x] Test the flow of cluster install such that the Cluster Service Principal Cluster are created correctly.
Is there any documentation that needs to be updated for this PR?
No
How do you know this will function as expected in production?