-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 737
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix crash with duplicate paths #4896
Conversation
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
You may test this build by running Add the following CLI flags
Or with all autorest --version:http://tinyurl.com/23rkx3vs --use:http://tinyurl.com/25gl42t3 or use the following in your autorest configuration: # For changes to autorest core
version: "http://tinyurl.com/23rkx3vs"
# For changes to modelerfour
use-extension:
"@autorest/modelerfour": "http://tinyurl.com/25gl42t3" If this build is good for you, give this comment a thumbs up. (👍) And you should run `autorest --reset` again once you're finished testing to remove it. |
@@ -351,7 +351,9 @@ async function main() { | |||
// - doing the inversion (instanceof Error) doesn't reliably work since that seems to return false on Errors marshalled from safeEval | |||
if (e instanceof Exception) { | |||
logger.log({ level: "error", message: e.message }); | |||
exitCode = e.exitCode; | |||
if (e.exitCode) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@timotheeguerin: Can you explain why this check is needed? Might be obvious but I don't see it.
fix #4882 too