Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move createjs.com to Github #3

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Move createjs.com to Github #3

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

owendwyer
Copy link

The homepage is an essential part of the CreateJS project. Hosting it on Github will allow it to be maintained for the foreseeable future.

0000-template.md Outdated
@@ -22,9 +22,6 @@ familiar with the project to understand, and for somebody familiar with the
implementation to implement. This should get into specifics and corner-cases,
and include examples of how the feature is used. Any new terminology should be
defined here.
Use definitive language, rather than proposing ideas here. The content of this
RFC can be discussed and refined on GitHub. Any unanswered questions can also
be written in the final 'Unresolved questions' section.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have these lines intentionally been removed? If so - what is the thinking?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was unintentional. I moved the default file when I should have copied it.

@jedateach
Copy link
Contributor

I like the idea of opening up the website, as part of the suite of things that make up CreateJS.

Hopefully the site is relatively simple. If it turns out the site is database-backed, then migrating to github might also mean doing some conversion work.

There might be a way to automate redeploying the site every time new versions of the createjs projects are released.

@owendwyer
Copy link
Author

Right, I guess it would be a good idea to exhibit a new release in the demo and tutorial pages too. That would mean updating the link on each page, but a simple find and replace script across all the files would suffice.

@jedateach
Copy link
Contributor

Yep, the site could alternatively be generated using a static site generator.

@jedateach jedateach added the Needs GSkinner Input RFCs requiring input from the current powers at be label Mar 13, 2020
@danzen
Copy link

danzen commented Mar 22, 2020

I like the site in its eternal glory. We have a lot on our plate. Could we not just update the link to the CDN and perhaps the examples at some point? Maybe the CDN page can be automated somehow - or at least start with that as a stopgap. @owendwyer I love how you made an RFC! It shows that we can do it! I did one too - woot!

@owendwyer
Copy link
Author

Right, I think the site looks fine as it is and I agree with the approach of keeping this as simple and quick as possible.

I'll see if I can get the site working on my GitHub page and then post a link back here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs GSkinner Input RFCs requiring input from the current powers at be
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants