Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add first set of sea maps #388

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 10, 2021
Merged

Add first set of sea maps #388

merged 7 commits into from
Apr 10, 2021

Conversation

aplaice
Copy link
Collaborator

@aplaice aplaice commented Feb 6, 2021

(For release notes: part of #386 + panning of the Yellow Sea map)

These are the ones that didn't seem to differ from the IHO 2002 maps at all. Many others differ very slightly (e.g. one of the limits is from the northern rather than the southern end of an island...).

src/data and sources.csv not changed yet.

Please feel leave feedback regarding panning/zooming in etc.! (Panning/zooming is easy to change!)

Banda Sea

ug-map-banda_sea.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=135

Barents Sea

ug-map-barents_sea.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=205

Celebes Sea

ug-map-celebes_sea.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=147

East China Sea

ug-map-east_china_sea.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=162

Possibly zoom in? (But the context is more important and zooming in more won't really provide much value. Compare the Yellow Sea and the South China Sea.

Gulf of Alaska

ug-map-gulf_of_alaska.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=176

Gulf of Guinea

ug-map-gulf_of_guinea.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=25

North Sea

ug-map-north_sea.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=16

Northern limit?

Sea of Okhotsk

ug-map-sea_of_okhotsk.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=171

Timor Sea

ug-map-timor_sea.png

http://wiki.geosys.ru/lib/exe/fetch.php/ru/portal/lib/iho/s23.los.ed4draft.2002.pdf#page=98

(Includes Joseph Bonaparte Gulf, but I think that that's correct.)

@aplaice aplaice marked this pull request as draft February 6, 2021 14:01
@axelboc
Copy link
Collaborator

axelboc commented Feb 6, 2021

  • Banda Sea ✔️
  • Celebes Sea ✔️
  • Gulf of Alaska ✔️
  • Gulf of Guinea ✔️
  • Sea of Okhotsk ✔️
  • Timor Sea

It is indeed correct to include the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf. I would perhaps just pan to the West a little.

  • Barents Sea

Very slight discrepancy with IHO: the western limit should go around the little island North of Norway:

image

  • East China Sea

How about panning to the West a little, so Southeast Asia and the Philippines are a bit more visible? Also, I feel like the eastern limit is a tiny, tiny bit off -- it should pass a bit East of one of the small islands:

image

  • North Sea

Maybe pan to the East a tiny bit? Regarding the limits, there are quite a few subtle differences with the IHO:

  • Northwest limit should be a straight line between the two islands instead of curving to the tiny island in the middle:

image

  • Northern limit should start at the tip of the northern most island):

image

  • Northeastern limit should include both fjords:

image

  • Waterways in the tip of Denmark should not be included:

image

  • Southern limit should go past the chain of islands up to the entrance of the main bay of the Netherlands:

image

  • ... and should not include the other bay near Belgium:

image


Those are all really minor details, so I'm not fussed if they're too hard to fix. 😉 They look awesome already 💯

@aplaice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aplaice commented Feb 7, 2021

Thanks for the very detailed feedback!

Timor Sea

Panned slightly west.

East China Sea

Panning changed

Yellow Sea

I've also changed it, since it probably should have the same panning as the East China Sea (and IMO it looks better now, compared to how I had previously panned it...).

Old

New

North Sea

Panning and some of the limits changed.

Not applied (yet?)

  • Barents Sea (western limit)
  • East China Sea (eastern limit)
  • North Sea (northwest limit)
  • North Sea (northern limit)
  • North Sea (waterways in the tip of Denmark)
  • North Sea (bay near Belgium)

(They're generally trickier, since they require the adjusting of the shapefiles, which I'm relatively hesitant to do, since doing it fully correctly is tricky, while doing it just-about-good-enough is still relatively time consuming, but feels "wrong" (I trust the shapefiles from Natural Earth Data to represent something, while I don't quite trust my own shapefiles which would neither be NE, nor quite IHO 2002 ones...

However, for some of the other cases where the discrepancies are greater, I might need to edit shapefiles, anyway, so if I get "into the swing of things" I might come back to some of these. (I've used my own shapefiles for the Bering Strait, and it wasn't that bad.)

If I do, then some of the other maps (e.g. the Norwegian Sea, which borders both the Barents Sea and the North Sea) might need to be updated, as well.)

@axelboc
Copy link
Collaborator

axelboc commented Feb 7, 2021

No pressure, these are great as they are and already tremendously beneficial to the deck! 💯

@axelboc
Copy link
Collaborator

axelboc commented Mar 16, 2021

I'm going to move all the tiny discrepancies that require modifying the shapefile into a separate issue. Let's get all those beautiful maps merged in, shall we!?

@axelboc
Copy link
Collaborator

axelboc commented Mar 16, 2021

Oh right, src/data and sources.csv still need to be updated, sorry. (Though for the sources, you can put TBC or something for now, I reckon.)

So my point is: happy to merge all your maps in their current state whenever you're ready. I'll open up the issue with the discrepancies once the PR is merged.

@aplaice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aplaice commented Apr 5, 2021

I think I'm done (with this set of maps). For review purposes 395d10c is the master-rebased version of the previous last commit.


I've added the English, German, Spanish and French translations but none of the others.

I'm ignoring the French name variation "Golfe de l'Alaska", as being similar to the main variant and the old German name "Meerbusen von Guinea" since quickly googling it, the only non-Wiki results appear to be colonial-era maps.


I haven't updated the counts in README.md since it's probably best to do it all in one go, but FWIW the number of notes and maps has increased by 9!


Generation scripts updated!

@aplaice aplaice marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2021 15:27
These are the ones that didn't seem to differ from the IHO 2002 maps
at all.

src/data and sources not changed yet.
It makes it easier to add new entries: just add them to the end and
then run:

LC_ALL=C sort < sources.csv | sponge sources.csv

(Ugh, I hate that this is locale-dependent and that, say, libreoffice
sorts in a yet another, very slightly different way, with denmark
after denmark_strait.  My sorting this way isn't intended to be
prescriptive for others, I just don't want to look for the
alphabetical place
to insert several new entries, but do want to distinguish the content
changes from the sorting changes.)

Also apply quote normalisation:

csvtool cols 1- sources.csv | sponge sources.csv
I'm ignoring the French name variation "Golfe de l'Alaska", as being
similar to the main variant and the old German name "Meerbusen von
Guinea" since quickly googling it, the only non-Wiki results appear to
be colonial-era maps.
@axelboc axelboc added the content Content changes, map improvements, translation fixes, etc. label Apr 10, 2021
@axelboc axelboc added this to the v4.2 milestone Apr 10, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@axelboc axelboc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!

I've added the remaining translations. A few of the article titles on Russian Wikipedia follow the homonymy scheme - e.g. Alaska (gulf), so I had to make some adjustments.

I think it's better to have potentially incorrect translations than no translations at all, as it's easier to fix something that exists than to realise that something is missing. That being said, I didn't look at alternative names at all, they're above my pay grade :D

@axelboc axelboc merged commit 6402d12 into anki-geo:master Apr 10, 2021
@axelboc axelboc mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2021
35 tasks
@aplaice
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aplaice commented Apr 10, 2021

I've added the remaining translations.

Wow! Thanks! You're right that some translation is better than no translation.

I wish we had a way of marking translations as "to be reviewed". OTOH by the law of the internet the best way to get an answer is to make a (potentially incorrect) statement, so we'll probably get feedback anyway. :)

@axelboc
Copy link
Collaborator

axelboc commented Apr 10, 2021

The minor insconsistencies with the IHO are now documented in a discussion thread: #412

@aplaice aplaice deleted the more_seas branch December 21, 2023 21:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Content changes, map improvements, translation fixes, etc.
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants