Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prototype: Rudimentary stack profiler #529

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

igorwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

We have a relatively large jsonnet code base (source), and I was trying to profile slow jsonnet invocations.

The golang-level profile via JSONNET_CPU_PROFILE wasn't very helpful in this regard. And tracing individual calls by adding std.trace was quite combersome.

I prototyped a little sampling stack profiler. It is not very sophisticated. It samples stacks for 1% of calls to EvalInCleanEnv. Those stacks can then be visualised as a flamegraph.

Usage:

JSONNET_STACK_PROFILE=stacks.out jsonnet main.jsonnet
cat stacks.out | flamegraph.pl --hash > flamegraph.svg

There's plenty of room for improvement:

  • Making the code nicer
  • Including a time component (since we currently assume each eval takes a fixed amount of time)
  • Buffering stacks in memory with their counts and writing out aggregated counts in the end

That said, the results I got from it so far look quite usable.

It's unlikely that I'll have much time to work on this and develop it into a fully-fledged solution.

I wanted to share what I have in case it's useful for others, or in case someone feels inspired to take the idea and develop it further.

Usage:

  JSONNET_STACK_PROFILE=stacks.out jsonnet main.jsonnet
  cat stacks.out | flamegraph.pl --hash > flamegraph.svg
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Apr 23, 2021
@sbarzowski
Copy link
Collaborator

This is very interesting. I was thinking about doing something like that myself, but didn't have much time recently.

I'd like to refactor it slightly (eliminate globals, extract all profiling logic to a separate function, so that in the normal flow it's just one check and one function call). Otherwise it looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants