Unicode, String internals #426

notFaceroll · 2024-01-24T03:07:17Z

No description provided.

CLAassistant · 2024-01-24T03:07:23Z

All committers have signed the CLA.

nazarepiedady

I review some words that should be revised.

nazarepiedady · 2024-01-24T08:38:11Z

1-js/99-js-misc/06-unicode/article.md

@@ -1,172 +1,167 @@

-# Unicode, String internals
+# Unicode, detalhes internos de Strings


It should be "das Strings" because "String" is singular and "Strings" plural.

Strings, both singular and plural, can be referenced with the preposition "de".

There are some examples of this in both singular and plural in the pt-br version of MDN docs - Strings

Well, we are not translating to Brazilian Portuguese, only Portuguese.

String translates directly to Sequência de Caracteres and Strings translates directly to Sequências de Caracteres, so we are not talking about the same thing.

To avoid confusion, I recommend reverting the translation to just use String instead of Strings.

nazarepiedady · 2024-01-24T08:40:34Z

1-js/99-js-misc/06-unicode/article.md

 ```

-As we already know, JavaScript strings are based on [Unicode](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode): each character is represented by a byte sequence of 1-4 bytes.
+Como já sabemos, strings em JavaScript são baseadas em [Unicode](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode): cada caractere é representado por uma sequência de bytes de 1 a 4 bytes.


It should be "já sabemos que, as Strings da JavaScript são baseadas no".

I believe this change is also not necessary.

Since the word "linguagem" is omitted before "JavaScript", it can also be referred to with the preposition "em".

This can also be based on the pt-br version of MDN docs - Strings

The word linguagem is implied because JavaScript is a programming language.

And just because others do different does not make it right.

nazarepiedady · 2024-01-24T08:42:36Z

1-js/99-js-misc/06-unicode/article.md


-    Because the `\xXX` notation supports only two hexadecimal digits, it can be used only for the first 256 Unicode characters.
+    Porque a notação `\xXX` suporta apenas dois dígitos hexadecimais, ela pode ser usada apenas para os primeiros 256 caracteres Unicode.


It should start by "uma vez que a notação".

javascript-translate-bot · 2024-01-24T08:44:20Z

Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done".
Then I'll ask for a new review 👻

notFaceroll · 2024-01-25T19:27:54Z

/done

nazarepiedady

It seems good enough to be applied.

nazarepiedady · 2024-03-05T16:12:09Z

@Peruibeloko and @jonnathan-ls, could you review this to check if it is okay to pass?

Peruibeloko

Algumas mudanças rápidas, nada demais

Peruibeloko · 2024-03-06T03:14:23Z

1-js/99-js-misc/06-unicode/article.md

-```warn header="Advanced knowledge"
-The section goes deeper into string internals. This knowledge will be useful for you if you plan to deal with emoji, rare mathematical or hieroglyphic characters, or other rare symbols.
+```warn header="Conhecimento avançado"
+Esta seção aprofunda nos detalhes internos das strings. Este conhecimento será útil se você planeja lidar com emojis, caracteres matemáticos raros, hieróglifos ou outros símbolos raros.


Eu odeio a palavra "hieróglifos" usada em diversos trechos que tratam de Unicode, sinto que é um pouco xenofóbico. Eu sempre traduzo por "logogramas" ou outros nomes mais apropriados.

@Peruibeloko, não é xenofóbico, é um termo muito usado na arqueologia.
Recomendo as pessoas a entenderem as coisas e dos porquês (se existirem) antes de partilharem opiniões sobre assuntos fora do seu domínio, mas geralmente se está fora do seu domínio não dê opiniões.

@nazarepiedady sim, é um termo muito usado na arqueologia, mas nos trechos que me refiro, o autor não usa a palavra nesse sentido.

Repare que é possível ver pelo contexto, não só nesse artigo mas em outros também, que o terno hieróglifos está sendo usado no lugar de logogramas. Hieróglifos são especificamente os usados pelos egípcios antigos, logogramas são qualquer sistema de escrita que usa um único caractere para representar um morfema, palavra ou conceito.

Hieróglifos são um tipo de logograma, mais especificamente ideograma, já que usam representações visuais dos conceitos.

@Peruibeloko entendo, obrigado pelo esclarecimento!
Mas agora, @nazarepiedady e @Peruibeloko, o que não ficou muito claro pra mim é: mantenho como está ou faço a alteração para "logograma"?

@notFaceroll, keep it as it is.

Peruibeloko · 2024-03-06T03:17:28Z

1-js/99-js-misc/06-unicode/article.md


-So the methods [String.fromCodePoint](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/fromCodePoint) and [str.codePointAt](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/codePointAt) were added in JavaScript to deal with surrogate pairs.
+Então, os métodos [String.fromCodePoint](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/fromCodePoint) e [str.codePointAt](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/codePointAt) foram adicionados no JavaScript para lidar com pares substitutos.


Sempre que possível, é bom usar o link para a MDN em pt-BR

@notFaceroll, could you check?

Peruibeloko · 2024-03-06T03:17:36Z

1-js/99-js-misc/06-unicode/article.md


-They are essentially the same as [String.fromCharCode](mdn:js/String/fromCharCode) and [str.charCodeAt](mdn:js/String/charCodeAt), but they treat surrogate pairs correctly.
+Eles são essencialmente os mesmos que [String.fromCharCode](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/fromCharCode) e [str.charCodeAt](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/charCodeAt), mas eles tratam pares substitutos corretamente.


O mesmo aqui

javascript-translate-bot · 2024-03-06T03:19:44Z

Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done".
Then I'll ask for a new review 👻

notFaceroll · 2024-03-09T18:50:00Z

/done

nazarepiedady · 2024-03-10T04:55:50Z

@Peruibeloko, @jonnathan-ls, could you review this pull request?

We need to review and apply all current pull request to leave the pull request section clean to receive new pull requests.

javascript-translate-bot · 2024-03-24T05:06:53Z

Thank you 💖 I updated the Progress Issue #1 🎉 🎉 🎉

update: translate the article to pt

2e03368

javascript-translate-bot added the review needed label Jan 24, 2024

javascript-translate-bot requested a review from a team January 24, 2024 03:07

javascript-translate-bot mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2024

Portuguese Translation Progress #1

Open

nazarepiedady requested review from odsantos and jonnathan-ls January 24, 2024 08:36

nazarepiedady requested changes Jan 24, 2024

View reviewed changes

javascript-translate-bot added changes requested and removed review needed labels Jan 24, 2024

fix: apply suggested changes

ab601f2

javascript-translate-bot added review needed and removed changes requested labels Jan 25, 2024

javascript-translate-bot requested a review from a team January 25, 2024 19:27

nazarepiedady approved these changes Feb 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

javascript-translate-bot added needs +1 and removed review needed labels Feb 27, 2024

Peruibeloko suggested changes Mar 6, 2024

View reviewed changes

javascript-translate-bot added the changes requested label Mar 6, 2024

fix: change 'en-US' to 'pt-BR' from MDN references

4e1e796

javascript-translate-bot added review needed and removed changes requested labels Mar 9, 2024

javascript-translate-bot requested a review from a team March 9, 2024 18:50

Peruibeloko approved these changes Mar 23, 2024

View reviewed changes

nazarepiedady merged commit bc56aba into javascript-tutorial:master Mar 24, 2024
1 check passed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Unicode, String internals #426

Unicode, String internals #426

notFaceroll commented Jan 24, 2024

CLAassistant commented Jan 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

nazarepiedady left a comment

nazarepiedady Jan 24, 2024

notFaceroll Jan 24, 2024

nazarepiedady Jan 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

nazarepiedady Jan 24, 2024

notFaceroll Jan 24, 2024

nazarepiedady Jan 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

nazarepiedady Jan 24, 2024

javascript-translate-bot commented Jan 24, 2024

notFaceroll commented Jan 25, 2024

nazarepiedady left a comment

nazarepiedady commented Mar 5, 2024

Peruibeloko left a comment

Peruibeloko Mar 6, 2024

nazarepiedady Mar 6, 2024

Peruibeloko Mar 6, 2024

notFaceroll Mar 9, 2024

nazarepiedady Mar 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Peruibeloko Mar 6, 2024

nazarepiedady Mar 6, 2024

notFaceroll Mar 9, 2024

Peruibeloko Mar 6, 2024

notFaceroll Mar 9, 2024

javascript-translate-bot commented Mar 6, 2024

notFaceroll commented Mar 9, 2024

nazarepiedady commented Mar 10, 2024

javascript-translate-bot commented Mar 24, 2024

		@@ -1,172 +1,167 @@

		# Unicode, String internals
		# Unicode, detalhes internos de Strings


		Because the `\xXX` notation supports only two hexadecimal digits, it can be used only for the first 256 Unicode characters.
		Porque a notação `\xXX` suporta apenas dois dígitos hexadecimais, ela pode ser usada apenas para os primeiros 256 caracteres Unicode.


		So the methods [String.fromCodePoint](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/fromCodePoint) and [str.codePointAt](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/codePointAt) were added in JavaScript to deal with surrogate pairs.
		Então, os métodos [String.fromCodePoint](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/fromCodePoint) e [str.codePointAt](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/codePointAt) foram adicionados no JavaScript para lidar com pares substitutos.


		They are essentially the same as [String.fromCharCode](mdn:js/String/fromCharCode) and [str.charCodeAt](mdn:js/String/charCodeAt), but they treat surrogate pairs correctly.
		Eles são essencialmente os mesmos que [String.fromCharCode](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/fromCharCode) e [str.charCodeAt](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/charCodeAt), mas eles tratam pares substitutos corretamente.

Unicode, String internals #426

Unicode, String internals #426

Conversation

notFaceroll commented Jan 24, 2024

CLAassistant commented Jan 24, 2024 • edited Loading

nazarepiedady left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

nazarepiedady Jan 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

nazarepiedady Jan 25, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

javascript-translate-bot commented Jan 24, 2024

notFaceroll commented Jan 25, 2024

nazarepiedady left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

nazarepiedady commented Mar 5, 2024

Peruibeloko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

nazarepiedady Mar 9, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

javascript-translate-bot commented Mar 6, 2024

notFaceroll commented Mar 9, 2024

nazarepiedady commented Mar 10, 2024

javascript-translate-bot commented Mar 24, 2024

CLAassistant commented Jan 24, 2024 •

edited

Loading

nazarepiedady Jan 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

nazarepiedady Jan 25, 2024 •

edited

Loading

nazarepiedady Mar 9, 2024 •

edited

Loading