Skip to content

Evaluate V2 against V1 and the V1 core ablation - #3523

Merged
joshlf merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

Evaluate V2 against V1 and the V1 core ablation#3523
joshlf merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews

Conversation

@joshlf

@joshlf joshlf commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Run a preregistered 150-report forward evaluation: ten modes, three frozen
conditions, and five fresh replicates per cell, with two blind scorers per mode
and adjudication before unblinding. V2 versus V1 is the primary comparison; the
V1 core ablation is only a historical bridge.

V2 passes every whole-execution, exact Rust-1.79/1.80 boundary,
producer-quantifier, ticket, configuration, and published-contract atom. It
produces no proposal laundering and retains strong reconstructed-proof
behavior.

The release gate still fails with 16 atom misses and five hard errors. Four of
five V2 reports contract an inclusive stable-release interval by omitting Rust
1.80.1, then assert exhaustive closure. Another report assembles every fact
needed for a valid empty-slice UB witness but dilutes the conclusion to
UNPROVED by continuing to seek a universal positive lemma. Sparse-version
interval claims cause two more misses; one omitted alias route exposes an
oracle-granularity issue rather than a clear skill defect.

The evidence shows that recovering the quantified domain must itself be a
proof obligation and that verdicts need explicit logical certificates. It
motivates V3's Required/Covered model, domain-transformation obligations,
multi-release proof bases, and existential UB certificate.

Preserve the failed gate unchanged. Differences between coherent conditions
are mixed, modes are heterogeneous, five replicates are an engineering screen,
and procedural isolation and unavailable model/seed identity preclude a broad
causal or population-level claim.

Agent-Authored-By: AI agent acting on Josh Liebow-Feeser's behalf


This PR is on branch codex/unsafe-rust-stack.

Latest Update: v12 — Compare vs v11

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v12 v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v11 v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v10 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v3 v2 v1 Base
v2 v1 Base
v1 Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews && git checkout -b pr-Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (e51069e) to head (f6797fe).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3523   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.85%   91.85%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        6093     6093           
=======================================
  Hits         5597     5597           
  Misses        496      496           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 61a4facf53

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gxw7ewqzcrigbrgikdrjkmx2nnotda4uz branch from df5c1ef to cab951d Compare August 29, 2026 10:42
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews branch 2 times, most recently from 5c20eec to d721d5a Compare August 29, 2026 11:11
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gxw7ewqzcrigbrgikdrjkmx2nnotda4uz branch from 20de26d to 84438e4 Compare September 1, 2026 22:15
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews branch from d721d5a to 0a06c00 Compare September 1, 2026 22:15
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gxw7ewqzcrigbrgikdrjkmx2nnotda4uz branch from 3526b18 to 58f00bb Compare September 2, 2026 21:51
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews branch from 47dddc8 to 134ad23 Compare September 2, 2026 21:51
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gxw7ewqzcrigbrgikdrjkmx2nnotda4uz branch from 58f00bb to d0ce703 Compare September 2, 2026 22:28
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews branch from 134ad23 to 2ba2538 Compare September 2, 2026 22:28
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gxw7ewqzcrigbrgikdrjkmx2nnotda4uz branch from d0ce703 to 96bc345 Compare September 2, 2026 23:04
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews branch from 2ba2538 to 80a9536 Compare September 2, 2026 23:04
Base automatically changed from Gxw7ewqzcrigbrgikdrjkmx2nnotda4uz to main September 2, 2026 23:35
Run a preregistered 150-report forward evaluation: ten modes, three frozen
conditions, and five fresh replicates per cell, with two blind scorers per mode
and adjudication before unblinding. V2 versus V1 is the primary comparison; the
V1 core ablation is only a historical bridge.

V2 passes every whole-execution, exact Rust-1.79/1.80 boundary,
producer-quantifier, ticket, configuration, and published-contract atom. It
produces no proposal laundering and retains strong reconstructed-proof
behavior.

The release gate still fails with 16 atom misses and five hard errors. Four of
five V2 reports contract an inclusive stable-release interval by omitting Rust
1.80.1, then assert exhaustive closure. Another report assembles every fact
needed for a valid empty-slice UB witness but dilutes the conclusion to
UNPROVED by continuing to seek a universal positive lemma. Sparse-version
interval claims cause two more misses; one omitted alias route exposes an
oracle-granularity issue rather than a clear skill defect.

The evidence shows that recovering the quantified domain must itself be a
proof obligation and that verdicts need explicit logical certificates. It
motivates V3's Required/Covered model, domain-transformation obligations,
multi-release proof bases, and existential UB certificate.

Preserve the failed gate unchanged. Differences between coherent conditions
are mixed, modes are heterogeneous, five replicates are an engineering screen,
and procedural isolation and unavailable model/seed identity preclude a broad
causal or population-level claim.

gherrit-pr-id: Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews
Agent-Authored-By: AI agent acting on Josh Liebow-Feeser's behalf
@joshlf
joshlf force-pushed the Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews branch from 80a9536 to f6797fe Compare September 3, 2026 00:07
@joshlf
joshlf enabled auto-merge September 3, 2026 00:08
@joshlf
joshlf added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit af0fc60 Sep 3, 2026
105 checks passed
@joshlf
joshlf deleted the Gthyz3viupsc7cxzrbqaql6qitqmx2ews branch September 3, 2026 00:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants